Ok, I am trying a software called Designrr. What they do is a tool that helps you to compose one or many blogposts into an ebook in a very simple way. I just did a very small test and collected a few of my latests posts related to the term "design thinking".
The ebook comes out in the form of a PDF. I have not put any effort really into layout or even fixing any language issues. I just wanted to see if it worked and I think it did. I might look more into this as a way of collecting and composing shorter writings into something longer and more substantial.
Here you can download the pdf.
Friday, December 30, 2016
Tuesday, December 20, 2016
Today's simplistic glorification of design and "The Burnout Society"
I am reading the book "The
Burnout Society" by Byung-Chul Han. It is a very short book, only
about 50 pages. Han is a Korean-born philosopher, now active in Germany. He has
published a series of short books.
I
read this book as a serious critique of our modern society which Han gives
different names, for instant 'the achievement society'. He argues that modern
society has developed a culture where we believe we can do anything, “yes, we
can”, where we are measured based on our achievements. He makes the case that
people get sick and depressed not because they are burdened by what he calls
disciplinary responsibility "but the imperative to achieve: the new commandment of late-modern labor society".
People get burnout because of "creative fatigue and exhausted
ability". We suffer from the "violence of positivity” that “does not
deprive, it saturates; it does not exclude, it exhausts.” Han argues that we
need more 'negativity', we need more "deep, contemplative attention",
that is, less achieving and more reflection and to reach this we need
"profound boredom" (p.12).
I
find this book fascinating, even though I only read a few chapters, am looking
forward to the rest. So, what does this have to do with design and the
philosophy of design. Well, it is obvious to me that the character of the
modern society that Han critiques includes the qualities that are commonly
revered by those who advocate design, such as the ideas to design artifacts and
systems that improves our ability to "do things" quicker, more
effortless, removed from the restrictions of time, place and community.
Designers commonly desire the creations of designs that are engaging, exciting,
and positive. Almost everything that is part of today's simplistic glorification
of design as the solution to every problem is based a philosophy that resembles
what Han is critiquing in his book. I find this extraordinary refreshing and
highly needed.
-->
Tuesday, December 13, 2016
The deceitful nature of design
I am reading here and there in Vilhem Flusser's
book "The shape of things--a philosophy of design". Flusser is a
thoughtful scholar with deep knowledge of the classics in many areas.
I was just struck by a section where Flusser
elaborates on what design is. Flusser uses the notions of 'deception and
trickery' as core in his definition. He says that when we design we create
something, a machine, that tricks nature in our attempt to 'making a new form
of culture possible'. With the use of technology and design we can create
machineries that make the impossible possible, things that nature can't
produce. But with this ability to deceive nature, comes responsibility. And
this is where I found the quote that in a brilliant way describes the role of
humans as designers.
"This
is the design that is the basis of all culture: to deceive nature by means of
technology, to replace what is natural with what is artificial and build a
machine out of which there comes a god who is ourselves." (Flusser, p 19).
-->
This
is both a wonderful and scary description. If by design, we humans approach a
god like state, we as a consequence take on god like responsibilities. Who
wants that responsibility? Who wants to be a god?
And Flusser continues. He brings in the question of value. He is warning us about the loss that design leads to. He writes:
"..a new perspective opened up within which one could create more and more perfect designs, escape one's circumstances more and more, live more and more artistically (beautifully). But the price we pay for this is the loss of truth and authenticity."
It is interesting to note that to Flusser, in this qoute, living artistically and beautifully is not the end all, the final goal or the life we should aspire to live. Instead, he argues for the 'truth' and 'authenticity'. This shift is something that others have pointed to, for instance, Brogmann in his 'device paradigm' theory. This relationship between the two theories become obvious when Fuller discusses 'value' and uses the cheap plastic pen as an example. He argues that when design replaced 'truth' and 'authenticity' with "perfectly designed artifacts" we find ourselves in a different world. (This reasoning is similar to Borgmann's device paradigm. When Flusser writes "all these artefacts become as valuable as the plastic pens, become disposable gadgets." it resonates with Borgmann's idea of 'devices'. )
Flusser then states that this explanation of what design is, is aimed at "exposing the cunning and deceptive aspects of the word design....because they are normally concealed." I find this examination of the 'deceitful' nature of design desperately needed today. The explosive growth, interest and glorification of design has led to a situation where the expectations are exaggerated, the process is drastically simplified, the philosophy and nature of design is neglected. This glorification and neglect will inevitably lead to serious disappointments and backlashes. Flusser's examination and Borgmann's philosophy gives us tools to in a more sober way examine our designed world and the role of design.
And Flusser continues. He brings in the question of value. He is warning us about the loss that design leads to. He writes:
"..a new perspective opened up within which one could create more and more perfect designs, escape one's circumstances more and more, live more and more artistically (beautifully). But the price we pay for this is the loss of truth and authenticity."
It is interesting to note that to Flusser, in this qoute, living artistically and beautifully is not the end all, the final goal or the life we should aspire to live. Instead, he argues for the 'truth' and 'authenticity'. This shift is something that others have pointed to, for instance, Brogmann in his 'device paradigm' theory. This relationship between the two theories become obvious when Fuller discusses 'value' and uses the cheap plastic pen as an example. He argues that when design replaced 'truth' and 'authenticity' with "perfectly designed artifacts" we find ourselves in a different world. (This reasoning is similar to Borgmann's device paradigm. When Flusser writes "all these artefacts become as valuable as the plastic pens, become disposable gadgets." it resonates with Borgmann's idea of 'devices'. )
Flusser then states that this explanation of what design is, is aimed at "exposing the cunning and deceptive aspects of the word design....because they are normally concealed." I find this examination of the 'deceitful' nature of design desperately needed today. The explosive growth, interest and glorification of design has led to a situation where the expectations are exaggerated, the process is drastically simplified, the philosophy and nature of design is neglected. This glorification and neglect will inevitably lead to serious disappointments and backlashes. Flusser's examination and Borgmann's philosophy gives us tools to in a more sober way examine our designed world and the role of design.
Thursday, December 08, 2016
Things That Keep Us Busy
Well, the production of our new book is under way.
Janlert, Lars-Erik & Stolterman, Erik. (2017)
Things That Keep Us Busy -- the elements of interaction
MIT Press.
It builds on these articles, but is much developed and extended.
-->
Janlert, L. E., & Stolterman, E. (2015). Faceless Interaction—A Conceptual Examination of the Notion of Interface: Past, Present, and Future. Human–Computer Interaction, 30(6), 507-539.
Janlert, L. E., & Stolterman, E. (2010). Complex interaction. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI), 17(2), 8.
Janlert, L. E., & Stolterman, E. (1997). The character of things. Design Studies, 18(3), 297-314.
Janlert, Lars-Erik & Stolterman, Erik. (2017)
Things That Keep Us Busy -- the elements of interaction
MIT Press.
It builds on these articles, but is much developed and extended.
Janlert,
L. E., & Stolterman, E. (2016). The Meaning of Interactivity—Some Proposals
for Definitions and Measures. Human–Computer Interaction,
(just-accepted).
-->
Janlert, L. E., & Stolterman, E. (2015). Faceless Interaction—A Conceptual Examination of the Notion of Interface: Past, Present, and Future. Human–Computer Interaction, 30(6), 507-539.
Janlert, L. E., & Stolterman, E. (2010). Complex interaction. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI), 17(2), 8.
Janlert, L. E., & Stolterman, E. (1997). The character of things. Design Studies, 18(3), 297-314.
If you are interested in reading them, just let me know and I will email them to you.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)